I would be comfortable with PG, except there is no clear definition of what
that may be.  It's much easier to enforce a "G" rating, where we all seem to
know what is and is not permissible.

Under earlier regimes, I kinda figure if it was OK on Leno it would be
acceptable on this list.  Now things are a bit tighter.  I don't have a
problem with that, though a bit more relaxed would be nice.  I just don't
want to open the gates to a slew of "F" substitutes.

Didn't we have someone stranded in Effing Ham recently?  Now THAT was
unacceptable!

;-)

Karl Wolz

|-----Original Message-----
|From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
|Michael Sullivan
|Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 1:00 PM
|To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
|Subject: List Rating G or PG?
|
|Not to start anything(really)  but I suggest that this list rating be
|upgraded from 'G' to 'PG'.  I guess replies should be to the moderators so
|as not to cause problems, but a vote would be cool.
|Michael in San Antonio
|91GL AT 'Gringo'
|73 Beetle