

| Subject: | Re: List Rating G or PG? |
| From: | Jim Johnston |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:18:50 -0500 |
My two cents... It's not that hard to refrain from cursing...I think a G-rated forum is much easier to monitor... While some may see some words as ok, others may not... If we go with a PG rating, inevitably there will be a disagreement on what is PG vs. what is non-PG... I say Keep it simple... Jim Wilmington, NC On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@gmail.com>wrote: > Can we talk about this now? G rated seems kinda hard since this list is > for > current/former/prospective vanagon owners and since you can't drive until > 15-16 yrs of age, I believe that the rules should be of a PG-rated nature. > Not a big issue since I can usually hold myself to the current rules. Just > would like to say a** or dam* and not have to go to Vanagon List > Confession. My .02. Have a great day! :-) > Michael in San Antonio > 91GL AT 'Gringo' > 73 Beetle > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:59 PM > Subject: List Rating G or PG? > To: vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com > > > Not to start anything(really) but I suggest that this list rating be > upgraded from 'G' to 'PG'. I guess replies should be to the moderators so > as not to cause problems, but a vote would be cool. > Michael in San Antonio > 91GL AT 'Gringo' > 73 Beetle >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »