Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: List Rating G or PG?
From:Michael Sullivan
Date:Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:26:04 -0600

I appreciate the vote, Jim.  I am not advocating cursing, just acknowledging
that we are adults and leeway should be given on the occasional breech in
decorum without the moderators having to be bothered. That's all.
Michael in San Antonio
91GL AT 'Gringo'
73 Beetle

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Jim Johnston <inmytree1@gmail.com> wrote:

> My two cents...
>
> It's not that hard to refrain from cursing...I think a G-rated forum is
> much easier to monitor...
>
> While some may see some words as ok, others may not...
>
> If we go with a PG rating, inevitably there will be a disagreement on what
> is PG vs. what is non-PG...
>
> I say Keep it simple...
>
>
> Jim
> Wilmington, NC
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Can we talk about this now?  G rated seems kinda hard since this list is
>> for
>> current/former/prospective vanagon owners and since you can't drive until
>> 15-16 yrs of age, I believe that the rules should be of a PG-rated nature.
>> Not a big issue since I can usually hold myself to the current rules.
>>  Just
>> would like to say a** or dam* and not have to go to Vanagon List
>> Confession.  My .02.  Have a great day! :-)
>> Michael in San Antonio
>> 91GL AT 'Gringo'
>> 73 Beetle
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:59 PM
>> Subject: List Rating G or PG?
>> To: vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com
>>
>>
>> Not to start anything(really)  but I suggest that this list rating be
>> upgraded from 'G' to 'PG'.  I guess replies should be to the moderators so
>> as not to cause problems, but a vote would be cool.
>> Michael in San Antonio
>> 91GL AT 'Gringo'
>> 73 Beetle
>>
>
>