

| Subject: | Re: List Rating G or PG? |
| From: | BenT Syncro |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:16:39 -0800 |
On Jan 15, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > Can we talk about this now? > Moderator Comment: By all means, discuss this as a Friday item. So far the majority of those who responded to your previous vote request have expressed a preference to keeping the G-rating. David Beierl can confirm when he gets a moment. I think only one or two listmembers said they didn't care either way. It doesn't take much effort to review postings for me especially since I can use your hijacked smartphone account to save $$$.;-) You may consider the hassle of posting reviews by the Moderators a non-issue. You may not be aware of this so permit me to post a reminder. The List has always been as a representative democracy but run closer to a benevolent dictatorship. As one of your representatives, I vote to keep the 'polite' level of conversation. Should David vote the opposite, we will ask for Jim Arnott to break the tie. I hope you are all having a fantastic Friday morning. BenT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »