

| Subject: | Re: List Rating G or PG? |
| From: | Larry Alofs |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:43:04 -0600 |
FWIW, I vote for the "upgrade" to PG or PG-13. I don't think many children read this list and those that might are probably less bothered by the language than the moderators are. Personally I don't think that my posts have ever used any "bad" language, but it just seems to be a waste of time to be so concerned about it. Larry A. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, BenT Syncro <syncro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Alistair Bell <albell@SHAW.CA> wrote: >> > > <snip> >> >> �then I implore my fellow list members to put some thought and >> imagination into your swearing. >> Colourful phrases and analogies might take a bit more time, but is >> sure a lot more more fun than a plain >> old four lettered word. > > Eggs-Actly! > > You went to Farouk University in the Middle East, you might enjoy the > same benefits as those �who went to Park University in Asia. I heard > French Connection United Kingdom (FCUK) employed people who couldn't > spell. You know what I have to say about that. IVQII. > > Wasn't too hard, was it? > > > BenT >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »