Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: List Rating G or PG?
From:Larry Alofs
Date:Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:43:04 -0600

FWIW, I vote for the "upgrade" to PG or PG-13.  I don't think many
children read this list and those that might are probably less
bothered by the language than the moderators are.
   Personally I don't think that my posts have ever used any "bad"
language, but it just seems to be a waste of time to be so concerned
about it.

Larry A.

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, BenT Syncro <syncro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Alistair Bell <albell@SHAW.CA> wrote:
>>
>
> <snip>
>>
>> �then I implore my fellow list members to put some thought and
>> imagination into your swearing.
>> Colourful phrases and analogies might take a bit more time, but is
>> sure a lot more more fun than a plain
>> old four lettered word.
>
> Eggs-Actly!
>
> You went to Farouk University in the Middle East, you might enjoy the
> same benefits as those �who went to Park University in Asia. I heard
> French Connection United Kingdom (FCUK) employed people who couldn't
> spell. You know what I have to say about that. IVQII.
>
> Wasn't too hard, was it?
>
>
> BenT
>