

| Subject: | Re: van aerodynamics, was Re: BenT's dream vanagon now for sale |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:19:50 -0500 |
Sure, just not thinking as clearly as I should be (so what's new, after all I'm officially old now, what with medicare card and all). thanks, David On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Jim Arnott wrote: > The big hole where the ice chest and lawn chairs go upsets the > airflow. Roger's California had the cowling the eliminated that hole > and it was noticeably cleaner. The luggage rack causes the boundary > layer to separate immediately behind it and become turbulent. That > increases drag. > > http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=316411&highlight=drag > > Jim > > On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Dave Mcneely wrote: > >> Granted that common sense fails often on many fronts. But I'd like >> to >> know, if indeed it is the case, how the vehicle with a pop top but no >> luggage rack would be more aerodynamic than the more typical camper. >> If >> the airflow is smoother over that top, I'd be surprised. But I've >> been >> surprised before. In this case, I'd just like an explanation, so I'd >> understand better. David
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »