You came to the right place for opinions ;)

I agree with Karl.

Will in Alaska.

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 16:28 -0700, Karl Wolz wrote:
> . Historical authenticity requires the sticker
> . Aesthetically, I'd leave it off
> Is there any reason, like an upcoming clear coat, that you can't put it on
> at a later date?  If not, this is a no-brainer.
> . FWIW, I don't care for the graphics of the sticker; too "Eighties"
>
> Call me - business.
>
> Karl
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
> |Jeff
> |Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:17 PM
> |To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> |Subject: Opinions Please...
> |
> |Hey all,
> |
> |
> |
> |I'm trying to decide if I should put a Tristar sticker back on my Tristar.
> |I have a couple brand new stickers, but I just don't know if it looks
> |better
> |with, or without the sticker.  I've been going back and forth on this issue
> |for months now.
> |
> |
> |
> |Here's a link to before (with sticker) and after (no sticker) pictures:
> |
> |
> |
> |http://www.autostadtwest.com/cars/tristar/label.html
> |
> |
> |
> |Anyways. I'm looking for opinions from the list:
> |
> |
> |
> |   Sticker or No Sticker???
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |Cheers,
> |
> |
> |
> |Jeff
>