Aren't we all getting too sidetracked? It appears Vanagons have
disappeared from this thread altogether. Please any further non-
Vanagon chatter until Friday.

Thanks!

BenT
Sent from by mobile moderator

On Feb 28, 2010, at 4:12 AM, Stephen Grisanti <bike2vcu@YAHOO.COM>
wrote:

> "...the 59 caddilac coupe de' ville"
>
> Oh, man, I'd like to agree but the '59 is overblown.  The '60 is
> just so much cleaner looking.  Not as iconic or attention grabbing,
> but better looking.  Let's see, the original Fiat 124 Spider with
> the tiny bumpers, the Alfa Romeo Giulia, the 289 Cobra, Porsche
> 904...actually, whatever starts readily, is paid for and hauls what
> I want is beautiful.  Sounds like a van.
>
> Stephen
>
> --- On Sun, 2/28/10, Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> From: Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM>
> Subject: Re: Are Vanagons pretty?
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010, 2:26 AM
>
> dear right lines
> if i were to suggest a right vehicle i would suggest the 59 caddilac
> coupe
> de' ville
>
> having said that i will repeat that any vw van style i was behind
> the wheel
> of turned more heads then any other vehicle i have ever owned or
> drove ...
> except the 59 coupe de' ville
> yours
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans <
> scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote:
>
>> I would not use the word 'pretty' to describe the shape.
>>
>> but ...the shape, and some nuances on it grows on me at least.
>> I wake up where I can look out at least 10 vanagons.
>
>
>
>
>