

| Subject: | Re: Friday question |
| From: | BenT Syncro |
| Date: | Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:23:14 -0800 |
Moderator Comment: Hey Fellows, Let's get back on track. It's not Friday anymore. I'm sure there's an insurance forum out there where this is happily discussed. Or pmail me. I used to be a fire and casualty agent a long, long time ago. Cheers, BenT Sent from my mobile device On Mar 6, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@COX.NET> wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't have a citation at hand, but will look for > reports on the matter. I know I read a report in Scientific > American, which of course is not a primary source, but articles > therein are drawn from research done by the authors. I've also read > at least one report in Science News, a magazine that summarizes > recent reports. The data in both cases were from insurance > statistics, from driving records, and from surveys, but were > reported in the fashion of accidents per mile driven and so on. > Scientific American is generally considered the tops of popular > science reporting. Given that the original reports were in peer > reviewed journals (the only kind that Science News draws from, and > the place that authors of Scientific American articles publish their > original studies), I am sure that proper controls were used to > adjust for miles driven, times of day, traffic conditions and so > on. Otherwise, the report would not have been in Scientific > American. > > DMc > > ---- Don Hundt <finishguy@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dave, >> I've always heard that about female drivers, but I've never seen an >> actual study. I'd be interested in the methodology used to arrive at >> those conclusions. Did the researchers take into account actual miles >> driven, or did they just take insurance statistics on the rate of >> accidents and tickets, men versus women? My assumption would be that >> there are more miles logged by men than women, that could certainly >> skew the data. >> Don >> >> Sent from my iPod >> >> On Mar 6, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@COX.NET> wrote: >> >>> women are better drivers than we are. They have lower accident >>> rates, cause less vehicle failure, and generate less stress in >>> passengers (documented by research, don't have citation handy). >>> >>> My wife prefers for me to drive, simply because she gets to rest. >>> But, she'll drive if I request it, and she does offer. I drive more >>> than she does, but we both put in a substantial fraction of the >>> miles. That holds with whichever vehicle we are using. since >>> neither of us considers driving to be a sport, neither of us feels >>> shortchanged if the other one drives. When she drives, I get to >>> read. I seldom sleep in the passenger role. >>> >>> David McNeely >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »