

| Subject: | Re: .................... and vanagons |
| From: | Neil2 |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:57:09 -0700 |
Well, you can take the boys out of the shop but not the shop out of the boys! Where's the wife, mistress or Vanagons in all this.?? hehehe ;-) On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@cox.net> wrote: > ---- Robert Fisher <garciasghostvw@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > --snip-- > > Wonder what a full size Murikan car gets, mileage wise, now a days? > > --snip-- > > > > My Dad has a maybe four-year old Buick LeSabre and once told me he'd be > > pissed if he got less than 34 on the highway. I've never had one but I've > > heard Buicks have always been up there in mileage. Makes you wonder why > GM > > couldn't do that with the rest of their lines. > > > > Cya, > > Robert > > EPA web site lists Buick La Cross/Allure, 6 cylinder, auto at 27 mpg hwy > for 2010 and 28 mpg for 2006. No LeSabre is listed in either year. I don't > know Buicks, so don't know how equivalent the two vehicles are, but > apparently LeSabre was discontinued before 2006. Hummers are listed at from > 14 to 16 mpg hwy. Mercury Grand Marquis, 8 cylinder, auto is listed at 23 > mpg hwy for both 2010 and 2006. Toyota Avalon, 6 cylinder, auto, is listed > at 28 mpg for both 2010 and 2006. > > My brother has two Grand Marquis and claims 30 mpg hwy, but drives max 60 > mph. I have always been able to get 3 or 4 mpg above the EPA hwy mileage > for just about any vehicle I've owned, but I drive within the speed limit > and judge traffic and conditions to maximize mpg. With my Prius I get 50-51 > mpg hwy (EPA says 48, and around 60 mpg in town (EPA says 51). For my '97 > Honda Accord (4 cylinder, 5 speed manual) I get 35 mpg hwy, EPA says 29. > When I drove a '93 Toyota Corolla (4 cylinder, 1.8 L, 5 speed), I got 38 > mpg hwy, EPA says 32. > > BTW, my Prius has never run away with me, but I believe I have sense enough > to get it into neutral and to squeeze down hard on the brakes if such a > thing happened. And there really is no braking problem with the vehicle. > What is claimed to be a problem is because for a split second as the car > switches from regenerative to friction braking, braking power is off. > During that time, it travels, according to NHTSA, 50 cm (about two feet), > which increases the stopping distance by that amount over what it would be > if that instantaneous lapse were not there. That is while traveling around > 7 mph. Perhaps some drivers perceive that, and stop braking? THAT would be > a problem. I perceive it, but just keep pressing the brake. The car slows > and stops normally. Never has seemed to be a problem to me. > > I am getting a little impatient with Toyota, however, because technically > my Prius is subject to the accelerator/floormat recall but all I have gotten > from Toyota is a card stating that I should remove the floormat and wait to > hear from them concerning when to take my car to a dealer. > > For large cars, GM and Ford are comparable to Asian. For small cars, Asian > was beating the snot out of American, but recent figures from EPA seem to be > similar. > > DMc > -- Neil2 '82 Diesel Westfalia (USS Tinosa) '86 Vanagon/Westfalia Wannabe (SaVannah) Nunquam Pendite Divendium
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »