

| Subject: | Re: .................... and vanagons (friday post with little Vanagon) |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:51:25 -0700 |
The fuel mileage difference has gone the other way. Our new 2007 Subaru Legacy 2.5i Wagon with 4 speed Tiptronic and overdrive gets better mileage than the equivalent manual transmission car. And it goes like the wind. =) On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Doug Alcock <doug.alcock@gmail.com> wrote: > This is probably heresy in this forum. Last spring I drove from near > Toronto, Canada to Georgia to get the manual tranny in my 84 Westy swapped > for an automatic tranny. The main reason was that my wife (after 10 years > of > trying) was not going to get the whole clutch business. And I wasn't averse > to the switch because I hate getting stuck in traffic with a manual > transmission. > > I LOVE THE AUTO TRANNY TOO!! > > There is a bunch of info on this list that indicates that the auto tranny's > are long-lasting and bullet proof. > > I was worried about power loss -- but lacking dyno results before and after > -- found no difference. I have an I4 emgine in my 84 Westy. > > The shift points are good -- and you can shift whenever you want to with > the > auto -- taught my wife to do this when climbing serious mountains -- not a > problem. > > Always been a thought of mine that the folks who advocate the 'better fuel > efficiency' of a standard trans are the ones who watch their tach's and > wind > out the shifts to redline -- never seen anyone who understands what a tach > is for who is watching it for better gas mileage -- YMMV. > > Cheers, > Doug > > > > > >>After 12 years I've driven all over the USA and I LUV my > >>automatic > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" Crescent Beach, BC www.thebassspa.com www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »