

| Subject: | Re: Mount propex under the vanagon? |
| From: | Rowan Tipton |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:16:30 -0400 |
On Apr 19, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Scott Chapman wrote: > Gasoline powered would mean you could run your gas tank empty and be > unable to travel. Then you'd have to carry spare gasoline in the rig > somewhere. I think I prefer propane for this application but I'll > give > it more thought. If you didn't need propane for anything you could have a second gas tank. But if you cook or heat water using propane I don't see the advantage... except maybe space. But the Espar heaters cost a lot more I think. r > > Neil2 wrote: >> Since you don't have said unit in hand, have you considered a gas >> fueled >> Airtronic or Hydronic Espar heater? They're quieter, and more >> efficient, or >> so users of both have said. >> >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Scott Chapman <scott_list@mischko.com >> >wrote: >> >> >>> Does anyone mount the propex under their vanagon rather than inside >>> somewhere? >>> >>> Space in the rig is at a premium. I'm thinking that it could be >>> done. >>> >>> Any thoughts on this? >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Neil2 >> '82 Diesel Westfalia (USS Tinosa) >> '86 Vanagon/Westfalia Wannabe (SaVannah) >> '08 170" 2500 Mega Roof Dodge Sprinter (Moby) >> Fulltiming since August 2008 >> Nunquam Pendite Divendium >> >> >> I remain, as always YrLyl&ObdntSrvnt, r
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »