

| Subject: | Re: Water Cooler System Design Flaw Workaround? |
| From: | Roger Whittaker |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:14:42 -0700 |
dear vanah-log-o-rhythm i think this list just became too smart for me if it continues i may have to reach for my copy of the soul of the universe http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1940PA.....48..570S yours On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:00 PM, David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> wrote: > At 01:22 PM 4/25/2010, Jake de Villiers wrote: > >> When approaching the long (15 - 30 minute) second and third gear >> grades through Eastern Washington and Idaho you'd turn on the fan >> before the rad got too hot. >> > > Ok, I see the idea. But do the numbers make sense? > > Lessee... at 75 horsepower output and 1/3 efficiency the engine's > going to be putting out something like 200 kw of waste heat, or 3.4 > kWh per minute. > > 18 quarts of 50/50 coolant weighs around 36 lb and has a specific > heat capacity of roughly 0.85 BTU per lb per deg F at working > temperature. So changing the entire coolant by 20F would get you > 0.85 x 20 x 36 = ~600 BTU, about what a sedentary human throws off in an > hour. > > 600 BTU = ~0.18 kWh. 3.4 kWh x 0.18 x 60 = ~32 > > So a twenty-degree change in the entire coolant would absorb the > waste heat of the engine for about thirty two seconds. I think this > is conservative since the coolant inside the engine won't be > participating in this, and because 75 hp may be conservative for > climbing a steep hill. > > Somebody check my numbers. If this number is anywhere near correct I > don't think it's worth the hassle. > > Yours, > David > -- roger w From Proverbs: Under three things the earth trembles, under four it cannot bear up: a servant who becomes king ... ---------------------------------------------------------- Explore printed work at: http://www.prliving.ca/ View the growing list of video work at: http://revver.com/find/video/?query=LastonLastof&search_on=owners
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »