

| Subject: | Re: Bilstein HD shock report |
| From: | Doug Alcock |
| Date: | Mon, 3 May 2010 16:16:57 -0400 |
Hi Loren -- so you're saying the Bilsteins HD's. I've been thinking I my 84 Westy would benefit from new shocks. I know for a fact that they haven't been replaced for the 11 years I've owned it -- what I'm hearing is that the KYB's are too harsh..... I have Michelin Agilis tires.... Cheers, Doug On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> wrote: > RE: Better Ride with Better Shocks > Okay, based directly on my experience with an '85 Westy and now a '90 > Westy. > Going from 'wrong' tires to right tires: Oh Wow!! I don't feel like I'm > riding on an elephant in a mud wallow! > Replacing badly worn shocks with new KYBs: Double Wow! The damn thing > actually tracks on the highway! (Include a wheel alignment also) > Replacing the KYBs with Bilsteins (HD, Bilstein doesn't list the Touring > for > the Vanagon) because replacing shocks was cheaper than replacing the > fillings in my teeth, I now have a vehicle I can drive with both confidence > and comfort. A friend is sure the KYB stands for "Kill Your Butt" or maybe > "Keep Your Bilsteins". > Neither one is perfect, you're not going to get sports car handling. If I > never drove on anything but very smooth blacktop or concrete the KYBs would > be fine. But on any rough surface, especially washboarded dirt roads, they > are just to stiff. With the Bilsteins my Westy handles much better. There > may well be a better solution (some say Koni) and I know the Syncro drivers > love the OMEs but for what I do and where I drive the Bilsteins are a very > good solution. > YMMV > -- http://www.dougalcock.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »