At 09:04 PM 5/10/2010, Peter K wrote:
>do have "reliable" as something I need in my vehicle... if I'm going to a
>race I can't really afford to get there the week after, so I assume "newer"
>means there is a better chance of getting parts and finding a mechanic "out
>there" who knows how to work on it.

Hmmm...reliable is as reliable does.  It will be reliable within any
reasonable criterion if you make it so.  That means correcting any
previous maintenance lacks and keeping up with the continuing
maintenance.  If you're used to Toyotas -- this isn't one.  Three
nines availability isn't going to happen.  Two nines should be
achievable with money and effort.  One nine is pretty easy to get.

>my needs are simple...
>learning enough to find / recognize a good westy that's comfortable for long
>trips, and has a high probability of getting there on time
>not too expensive to keep in good shape, my budget is limited (and as I
>indicated, my skills to do the repairs are limited too)
>low running costs (and all of them have small engines and are old enough to
>get senior's discounts on insurance!)
>
>all this leads me to think an 87-91 vanagon, yes? no?

Mphm.  I'm inclined to say no.  If you find that a Vanagon is the
vehicle you simply must have it will give you great satisfaction and
you'll pay what you have to in money and additional skills to keep it
going.  If you don't then you're quite likely to find owning one a
frustrating and expensive experience.  Finding a mechanic skilled
with these beasts is difficult.  The running costs aren't so
wonderful either; people report between about 16-20 mpg.  It's a bit
like a dog -- it will love you without reserve, but the vet bills can
be tough.  But this is a decision that will come from your heart, not
your brain.

Your brain should be telling you to get an EV or even a Chrysler or
Ford van.  Or going in the other direction, a Sprinter.

Yours,
David