

| Subject: | Re: Symptoms of a bad starter? |
| From: | dylan |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:04:53 -0700 |
Cool, thats your method. "Some conductivity" in a few more years will be no conductivity. I remove the old and replace with new. My vans and clients vans really appreciate the effort. Reliability is the highest concern at my shop. � ________________________________ From: Ry <rylincoln@gmail.com> To: dylan <insyncro@yahoo.com> Cc: vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com Sent: Sat, July 24, 2010 11:44:13 AM Subject: Re: Symptoms of a bad starter? the old cables are not "useless" �they are still providing some conductivity, so adding new cables to the old cables will be likely better than "new". ~$40 for all the cable to replace. -Ry http://www.google.com/profiles/rylincoln On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:25 AM, dylan <insyncro@yahoo.com> wrote: I remove the old useless cable. Why keep it? >I replace them with cables exclusively from 90 or 91 vans that had the dual >battery setup stock. >I test all compnents before doing anyhting. > >If you want new cable...be prepared to pay handsomely. >Welding supply has what you need. > >FYI, 1.9 starters are 3/4 hp vs. 1 hp for the 2.1s. >Watch it on rebuilds. >They don't differentiate between the two any longer. >I send all 3/4 horse starters back and don't even mess with them. > > > > >________________________________ > >From: craig cowan <phishman068@GMAIL.COM> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Sent: Fri, July 23, 2010 8:49:20 PM > >Subject: Re: Symptoms of a bad starter? > > >So if you run a new cable, you just run it strait from the battery to the >starter? >Do you remove the old one? Does the old one go exclusively from the battery >strait to the charger? > >So, you would get a piece of wire, with the same battery post clamp on one >end? (And the eye on the other). > >-Craig > > > >On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ry <rylincoln@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I had similar problems on my 2.1.� My solution, which may or may not work >> for you, was to run parallel cables at the following locations. >> Battery <----------------------------> starter ~ 11 feet >> Front Transmission <---------> Body� ~ 8 inches� (make sure not to connect >> just to the transmission mount bolts as this is electrically insulated from >> the rest of the engine/transmission assembly by the rubber mount) >> Alternator <---------> Starter� � ~2.5 feet >> >> All cables made from 2/0 purchased from welding supply and crimp connected >> to closed ring connectors found in the same supply store. >> >> My van starts with ZERO hesitation now and turns over super quick.� Before >> I couldn't get it to turn over and jumping it would barely work. >> >> MIGHT be your whole problem or just PART of the problem.� The other things >> mentioned about the brushes wearing out are also a likely culprit. >> >> -Ry >> http://www.google.com/profiles/rylincoln >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:13 AM, craig cowan <phishman068@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > So, my starter is a randomly picked, untested 1.9 starter that was in a >> > pile >> > of them some years ago. >> > >> > Lately, the bus simply won't start. I get great power to all the >> > accessories, the battery appears to be holding and charging just fine, >> but >> > the thing just won't turn over fast enough to be of any value. I've >> cleaned >> > all my grounds, I've tightened all my leads, and yet.... no dice. >> > Jumping the battery off another car no longer has any effect. >> > >> > I'm starting to think my starter is a bad egg. Any thoughts? >> > What type of symptoms would be expected from a failing starter....if >> other >> > than what I described? >> > >> > -Craig >> > >> > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »