

| Subject: | Re: AFM track cleaning wisdom |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:51:55 -0400 |
At 08:44 AM 8/12/2010 Thursday, Mike \"Rocket J Squirrel\" wrote: >Whaaaa..? > >Sez who? The term "Vanagon Syndrome" has been rather corrupted. The original tech note from VW referred to a resonance effect under certain conditions of steady throttle and load that could trigger an ECU error mode. The fix was an active circuit inserted into the AFM line that limited maximum rate-of-change of the AFM signal. This tech note was later extended to the 1.9l -- and indeed, I once experienced the genuine article on a long straight road in Scotland in '91, when my total mileage behind the wheel of a Vanagon was oh say 500 or so. It was in the '84 Westy that later became Dutiful Passage. A couple hundred miles earlier I'd experienced full-on 3-4 synchro hub failure, so you can see I was richly blessed. And so I was, with a sister (the then owner) who paid three thousand Scottish pounds at the dealer for a transmission swap. After a while VW quit giving out the little harness for free and started charging serious money for it, and some bright spark thought "I bet a few microfarads in the right place would do the job just as well," and so it was. But the law of unintended consequences came into play -- since either device limited maximum rate of change of the signal, it would largely cover up for little dropouts caused by track wear in the AFM. For once this was a good thing. Thus saith the Lord. Yours, David
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »