

| Subject: | Re: Oil overfill... or not? (long post) |
| From: | Karl Wolz |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Aug 2010 15:00:26 -0700 |
My recollection, FWIW, is that the oil started frothing just above the full mark; the admonition being to definitely not overfill, and perhaps a bit under the mark would be better than over it. This turned into a discussion on the lack of a plate in the engine to "put a lid on the oil". I do not recall what the plate is called, though I'm sure someone else will. YMMV, Karl Wolz |-----Original Message----- |From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of |Edward Maglott |Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 10:27 AM |To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM |Subject: Re: Oil overfill... or not? (long post) | |Years ago, someone posted info on the list from watching the inside |of the WBX through a borescope (I think that's the right word) while |it was running. They started with oil at a low level and added |oil. IIRC, at about the mid point on the dipstick the crankshaft |starts hitting the oil in the sump. That is what causes the unusual |frothing that you never want in your engine. As they added more up |to the "max" mark, it got really wild in there with a great amount of |oil being flung around and air being pumped into the oil in the |sump. Not only does the crank hitting the oil in the sump add air to |it, the resistance of it passing through even a small amount of oil |puts additional load on the engine. | |I think there are several things we owners have learned about the WBX |over the past many years that are wise "adjustments" to the factory |specs decreed by the loved/hated German engineers who designed our |beloved Vanagons. This is one. |Edward
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »