

| Subject: | Re: bounce related to vanagon list post: Fwd: Your email requires verification verify#S8kdm1YcyRtVOIQT5uWJNjsC2FyaBska) |
| From: | Jim Arnott |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:25:28 -0700 |
<listmember hat on> The below is generated by a listmember using a whitelisting service. It requires that mail received from any new address respond to a computer generated message before it will allow delivery of the original message. Personally, I feel that such services are rather presumptuous on the subscriber's part. My immediate reaction to such notices is, "You signed up here. You want information from us. Why should I have to jump through ANY hoops to share my thought with you. You want me to send email to you. You make it happen. It's not my responsibility." Then I delete the whitelist request. If I get another one, I simply create a rule to trash further mail coming from that address. But that's just me. Jim On Sep 11, 2010, at 12:17 PM, a Vanagon List subscriber wrote: > got this message back after sending a post to the list. > > > >> Received: by 10.216.139.161 with SMTP id c33cs79682wej; >> Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:57:29 -0700 (PDT) >> Received: by 10.150.219.18 with SMTP id r18mr16936ybg. >> 172.1284227848397; >> Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:57:28 -0700 (PDT) >> Return-Path: <ventas@ingmedia-cr.net> >> Received: from server1.inmedia-cr.net ([174.36.1.34]) >> by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q31si8595441ybk. >> 50.2010.09.11.10.57.28; >> Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:57:28 -0700 (PDT) >> Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 174.36.1.34 is neither permitted >> nor denied by best guess record for domain of ventas@ingmedia- >> cr.net) client-ip=174.36.1.34; >> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: >> 174.36.1.34 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record >> for domain of ventas@ingmedia-cr.net) smtp.mail=ventas@ingmedia-cr.net >> Received: from ingmedia by server1.inmedia-cr.net with local (Exim >> 4.69) >> (envelope-from <ventas@ingmedia-cr.net>) >> id 1OuUKN-0005u3-RT >> >> X-Boxtrapper: aKGXbY4I71S9dv2eqJ7Lb7YgZnB3porH >> X-Autorespond: aKGXbY4I71S9dv2eqJ7Lb7YgZnB3porH >> Precedence: auto_reply >> X-Precedence: auto_reply >> From: ventas@ingmedia-cr.net >> To: emaglott3@gmail.com >> Subject: Your email requires verification >> verify#S8kdm1YcyRtVOIQT5uWJNjsC2FyaBska) >> Message-Id: <E1OuUKN-0005u3-RT@server1.inmedia-cr.net> >> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:57:27 -0500 >> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include >> it with any abuse report >> X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.inmedia-cr.net >> X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gmail.com >> X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [559 555] / [47 12] >> X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ingmedia-cr.net >> >> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >> >> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >> the subject line intact. >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> >> >From owner-vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Sat Sep 11 12:57:27 2010 >> Received: from gerry.vanagon.com ([71.126.148.6]) >> by server1.inmedia-cr.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) >> (envelope-from <owner-vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>) >> id 1OuUKN-0005tt-O1 >> for ventas@INGMEDIA-CR.NET; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:57:27 -0500 >> Received: from gerry (gerry.vanagon.com) by gerry.vanagon.com >> (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.004B1E55@gerry.vanagon.com >> >; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:56:55 -0400 >> Received: from GERRY.VANAGON.COM by GERRY.VANAGON.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/ >> IP release >> 1.8d) with spool id 8770828 for vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM; >> Sat, 11 >> Sep 2010 13:39:51 -0400 >> Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com by gerry.vanagon.com (LSMTP >> for Windows >> NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.004B1E4D@gerry.vanagon.com>; >> Sat, 11 Sep >> 2010 13:39:51 -0400 >> Received: by ywt2 with SMTP id 2so2103939ywt.41 for >> <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:39:49 >> -0700 (PDT) >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; >> s=gamma; >> h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:x-mailer:date:to >> :from:subject:mime-version:content-type; >> bh=2lQdRIGlyagJ16MuoDszrwHiHsUMJW3sOMXvJ0cFric=; >> b=uPo69AbRYj3TXoYXSNrcX7n/dGnAS+8LjY3rSyy2n4qmOcxJvafFwqykfm/gquj4pd >> 4ZPRepURxi0GyZG5j+pg0HvQcOs14bEjGQ2vzIPDXh2aYpGwcuZaoC5de4JC69fnjOVj >> DtGnJdaAXiMtWRKK+FqprXpU2+N1hak1se6yI= >> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >> h=message-id:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:mime-version:content-type; >> b=HB9ohKwGDkZnR/TFycs4v/Wfk6j1OENyb8nnhfB68axW79cj3HLexC9zmjemWawrjl >> PinXFy/Wg9C0FnmPlUFAnrTtaRrWOjA3tKTL7kbCrz9TLVV4izOGhEnuBnWrjyZRLe4B >> K7mE87IiBSniMMK/pjheaJeA16v6YhwItvw4Y= >> Received: by 10.100.29.28 with SMTP id c28mr2246025anc. >> 227.1284226789550; Sat, >> 11 Sep 2010 10:39:49 -0700 (PDT) >> Received: from pczx13900.gmail.com >> (adsl-243-181-159.ard.bellsouth.net >> [74.243.181.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id >> w6sm6258149anb.3.2010.09.11.10.39.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 >> cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:39:48 -0700 (PDT) >> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 >> Mime-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed >> Message-ID: <4c8bbee4.0663640a.2fc7.ffffc9c9@mx.google.com> >> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:39:47 -0400 >> Reply-To: <deleted> >> Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com> >> From: <deleted> >> Subject: semi-urgent auto transmission question >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »