Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
VanagonEuroVan
Subject:Re: vanagon Digest - 14 Sep 2010 - Special issue (#2010-891)
From:Larry Chase
Date:Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:18:15 -0500

Volks,

First .. maggie & I are humbled by the wonderful things being said about us.

Thank You one and all from the bottom of our hearts.

Second ... as far we know this is a PayPal audit, no list member or anyone else has filed a complaint.

This is part of the communication we received from PayPal:

"PayPal has conducted a periodic review of your account, during which we noted that your account 
accepts donations for a charitable organization. In order to be fully compliant with the IRS regulations..."
  ... and so on and so forth.

They provided a long list of documentation they want for the future and are telling us we need to switch from a personal account to a business account.

So perhaps it's time to seriously look into 501c3 non-profit status for roadhaus.com and the PiFF activity.

Important ... there is no impact to our current fund raising efforts for Andrew's family.

Thank you all for your concern.

larry & maggie
roadhaus.com

On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Automatic digest processor wrote:

> ate:    Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:00:10 -0700
> From:    Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@GMAIL.COM>
> Subject: Re: Legal advisor? Re: Andrew Grebneff Memorial Fund
> 
> dear donatorites
> it is very likely that the increase in activity with the $$ directed toward
> NZ that alerted PP folks ... they likely have some sort of google filter on
> amounts over 1K$ or multiples of K$ ... and this is what prompted the
> initial email that started the ball rolling
> 
> aside from that we all know of larry and maggie ... and thier reputation as
> being wonderful ...
> yet one hopes that in the  event of a terrible calamity where neither could
> administer the $$ in a fund then there needs to be clear lines of
> beneficiary drawn up ... and presented to PP ... i mean really most days we
> can hardly agree on the inclusion of swear words let alone who will get to
> divest a fund ...
> 
> Just contributing an unsolicited 2 cents worth too ... :)
> yours

Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »