

| Subject: | Re: I am considering installing an auxiliary oil cooler |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:55:24 -0500 |
This looks promising Jonathan, thanks. A warning: I clicked on the second link, and when I got through for now, I tried to leave. Havoc ensued. After loading 87 copies of Firefox, and a whole host of flashing and blinking, my machine froze. Luckily, I was able to restore quite promptly, though when my machine rebooted, the 87 copies of Firefox were evidently running. I just had to close each one sequentially. Looks like no harm done, but something screwy between that link and my machine. David ---- Jonathan Poole <jfpoolio@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > When adding an external oil cooler I can't easily think of a scenario in > which you wouldn't want to include a thermostat in the circuit. Ideally the > oil gets to optimal temp quickly and stays there. > > I have a cooler and thermostat from this site: > > http://www.bus-boys.com/ > > See this page: > > http://www.bus-boys.com/oilcoolingremote.html > > I got the full setup with the larger cooler, thermostat and filter sandwich > adapter from them and have been very pleased with it for years and thousands > of miles. > > No matter what setup you go with a thermostat will help your engine last > longer even if you live in a typically warm climate. If you live in a warm > climate you could get one of the engine oil heaters (that race teams use or > similar) to keep your oil at operating temp even when you aren't running the > engine, in that case you may not want a thermostat in the oil cooler loop. > > Jonathan Poole > '83 AC Westy -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »