The biggest problem with URL shortening is that the firms that provide such
services seem to come and go.  Hence, ten years from now the archived URL is
almost guaranteed to be 404. (As will the original URL I suspect.)

Jim

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ry" <rylincoln@GMAIL.COM>
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 9:36 AM
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Subject:      Re: [VANAGON] Battery placement alternatives

> Same link as from Alistair, just shortened at http://is.gd  is there an
> unwritten rule about using URL shortening services in the list?  Serious
> question, not being a jerk.
>
> http://is.gd/fECqP
>
> -Ry