

| Subject: | Re: no vanagon content - nice aeroplane spotted |
| From: | Karl Wolz |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Nov 2010 23:22:45 -0700 |
Trent 900 not reliable enough; I'll stick with the wasserboxer. Karl Wolz |-----Original Message----- |From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of |Scott Daniel - Turbovans |Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 10:12 PM |To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM |Subject: Re: no vanagon content - nice aeroplane spotted | |consider that the Rolls Royce Trent 900 is bigger than a vanagon .. |might be a pretty tricky engine conversion. | |converting to another type of fuel isn't hard though. |The size of the tank needed though ...that would have to be on a very large |trailer towed behind. | | |----- Original Message ----- |From: "Al Knoll" <anasasi@GMAIL.COM> |To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> |Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 6:00 PM |Subject: Re: no vanagon content - nice aeroplane spotted | | |> er ah, there's a few fuel issues with care and feeding of such exotica. |> |> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:48 PM, BenT Syncro <syncro@gmail.com> wrote: |> |>> Heck with stuffing a Merlin in a Vanagon. How about a Trent 900. There |>> might be a bunch coming up on the used A380 engine market.;-) |>> |>> |>> BenT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »