

| Subject: | Re: Originally: JLP rebuilt wbxr engines in Denver |
| From: | Joe Luther |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:52:36 -0500 |
Does this stretch bolt issue apply to a 2.0 air cooled? thanks -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of Scott Daniel - Turbovans Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:27 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Originally: JLP rebuilt wbxr engines in Denver hi.. talking with an engine supplier I'm getting rebuilt 2.1 from .. they say 2.1's do that due to the stretch rod bolts eventually stretching more .. that usually leads to increased oil clearance on the rods .. which may lead to rod failure, thus ventilating the case. they say 1.9's don't do that due to using a non-stretch type rod bolt..which they assemble 2.1's with now. and with the longer stroke of the 2.1 there is the increased angle affect, as pointed out by Dennis yesterday. btw, this engine rebuilding company I'm talking to will even built a 2.1 in a 1.9 case since some people think the 1.9 case is stronger .. but they say the cases are identical in construction .. and it's the 2.1 rod bolts that are the cause of blown 2.1's. Scott
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »