

| Subject: | Re: Originally: JLP rebuilt wbxr engines in Denver |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:26:53 -0600 |
From what I remember - the real issue was about the stretch bolts used on the rod ends in the original 2.1L WBX engines. In time, they allowed the rod end bearing to loosen, resulting in oil pressure loss and a resulting seizing of the rod on the crank, breaking the rod and throwing the broken rod through the case. Replacing the bolts with the 1.9L rod bolts at overhaul resolves the problem. That's just what I recall from various readings. I got the impression from Dennis' comment there may be something more that is involved. Just dunno. John John Rodgers Clayartist and Moldmaker 88'GL VW Bus Driver Chelsea, AL Http://www.moldhaus.com On 2/10/2011 7:06 AM, VWBrain@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 2/10/2011 1:17:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > inua@CHARTER.NET writes: > > So are you saying the 2.1L WBX is more prone to a rod through the > block than a 1.9L engine is? > > John > > Hey John IIRC Boston Bob always used the 1.9L rods in his motors , I > am thinking he thought they were stronger which is good enough reason > for me later mark d
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »