

| Subject: | Re: Rear Vanagon Removal |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:10:48 -0600 |
I'm not sure I understand this completely, but more than one person on the list suggested a while back that plugging the hoses interferes with proper coolant distribution. Seems to me that plugging them would be no different than closing the valve on the heater. But, I removed the hoses completely, including the T-junctions at the long heater hoses that go forward under the van. I just ran those hoses straight. One less thing to break. I opted to keep the heater in case some future buyer wants it. BTW, I also used a piece of 3/8" plywood to form a floor under the spot where the heater sat, to protect the wiring there from damage by stored items. mcneely ---- Gary Freshley <gfreshley@YAHOO.COM> wrote: > When I found a small puddle of coolant in front of the left tire, I thought head > gasket, no way. It ended up being the rear heater control leaking enough that in > ran across the body to the low side of my '84 Westy. Upon inspection, it's > been leaking for quite awhile. Therefore I've removed the rear heater and > plugged and capped the two heater hoses. > > > So question is: Is plugging those hoses in anyway a problem?? I remember > reading that listers had done this, but I'm curious as to any side effects from > do this? I can't see how the coolant circulation is any different than having > the rear heater valve closed, but has anyone who's done this had any issues with > their cooling system?? > > PS. Any of you northern tier guys need a rear heater? pmail me. Nice having the > extra storage under the bench seat. > > Gary > '84 Wolfberg Westy "Lola" -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »