

| Subject: | Re: Failed emission inspection |
| From: | Gregg Carlen |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Mar 2011 20:49:29 -0500 |
So, I spent the day at the shop replacing ball joints, front shocks and cat/muffler. Sure enough, the cat (which had one flange cut off and a non-standard muffler welded to it) was hollow inside! No wonder I failed the emissions test. Retest is tomorrow morning. On Mar 4, 2011, at 6:18 AM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com> wrote: > The CO and NOx readings combined indicate a bad cat. CO above .5 is not lean > at all as .5 is the ideal before the Cat. > Over advanced ignition timing may also be a problem but you really need the > Cat. > > Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Gregg Carlen > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 4:51 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Failed emission inspection > > Hey folks, > > Guess I'm not too suprised that something was amiss when I went for my > emissions inspection today (Virginia). As many goofy things that the PO did > to this van (90 Westy).... > > Anyway, here's the stats: > > At 15mph > HC: 107 (limit 159), pass > CO: 0.83 (limit 1.34), pass > NO: 2568 (limit 1077), fail > > At 25mph > HC: 104 (limit 155), pass > CO: 0.72 (limit 1.73), pass > NO: 2085 (limit 984), fail > > Right off the bat, I'm thinking the I'm running too lean (e.g. combustion > too hot) and/or the cat isnt' doing its job. > > My thoughts would be to a) check the timing and b) replace the cat (there's > a non-standard muffler welded onto the cat, so it will be a new cat and > muffler/tailpipe; which I was planning to do eventually anyway since its > louder than a stock muffler would be). > > Thoughts? Am I headed in the right direction? (Yes, the cat was hot when I > took it in). > > Gregg > 90 Westy >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »