

| Subject: | Re: Blown fuse |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:29:34 -0400 |
At 10:47 PM 3/15/2011, Robert Stevens wrote: >Makes me wonder that if you were to run a test wire with a fuse in >its line, bypassing the fuse panel, to the wires going into the back >of the fuse panel at #8, .... if you'd then find out >that something has "melted" in the panel that is creating the resistance? Bob, when you're tracing a short circuit controlled by a single fuse and without easy means to disconnect parts of it there are three basic ways to go about it. First is visual inspection, oops I mean looking at it. Second is measuring resistance; but that requires a much more sensitive ohmmeter than most of us have access to. The third (which I described in my previous post) is essentially to fake a very sensitive ohmmeter by passing a large but controlled current through the circuit and measuring the voltage drops. The branches with no current flowing will show a constant low voltage, but the branch with the short will show a voltage that decreases as you get nearer and nearer to the short. Ah - with the new clamp-on DC ammeters there's a fourth method as well. Then there are all the ways involving unhooking stuff, of course. Yours, David
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »