At 06:19 PM 3/24/2011, Troy wrote:
>all over.  It's not a bad design, just poorly executed and think we
>are all in agreement on that;)

If it didn't have to be backward-compatible with the electrode-type
sensor it probably wouldn't fail if it got a drop of water inside.

For that matter if the board were dip-coated with something
waterproof it would be more robust that way.

Yrs,
d