

| Subject: | Re: To bleed or not to bleed |
| From: | Dennis Haynes |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Apr 2011 09:09:10 -0400 |
The system really needs to be bleed after the radiator empties. If the system is working and cooling and all else is well it should finish bleeding itself over time. Most important is that there are no leaks and be sure the valves in the pressure cap are good. Both the pressure relief and the vacuum inlet. This needs to be tested. Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Bill Shawley Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 8:57 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: To bleed or not to bleed So I got busy last week on a "quick" 10 minute job. I replaced the short piece of coolant hose (86 2wd Westy, 2.1) that connects that wicked coolant tower contraption to the long plastic coolant tube that runs to the radiator. This is the large diameter hose piece, last year I noticed it was weeping and double clamped it, just got the replacement this year. Well it was a big PIA to replace as I had to disconnect that coolant tower to get the new piece installed. I lost about a gallon of coolant. I filled the main reservoir to the tippy top and filled the overflow (tank behind license plate) to the tippy top, it took a gallon. I've had a few driving cycles and the coolant level is stable and in the appropriate range on the tank (hot/cold marks). My temp gauge is reading lower than I'm used too, BUT I don't normally drive around in 30-40 degree weather, heat is fine. Do I need to bleed or are things hunky dory? I'm worried about some engine melting air bubble or something. If I had ready access to a helper I would've just bled the damn thing already! Ryan
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »