

| Subject: | Re: Rain-X .... What's your experience? |
| From: | Sudhir Desai |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:20:52 -0400 |
RE: your caveat I definitely agree. On my Golf in heavy rain, if i'm not driving fast enough to clear the water quickly, I use slow speed intermittent. :) Sudhir On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 13:44, David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> wrote: > At 12:32 PM 4/13/2011, John Rodgers wrote: >> >> Got caught in a rain when the wipers decided not to work. Rain-X would >> have been nice about then. I've never used it myself, but at that moment >> sure thought about it. Might like to try it, but would appreciate first >> hearing what the List's experience has been with the stuff. > > One caveat - when those magic little beads of water get hit with a > bright light they *light up.* Doesn't seem to be a big problem with > a Vanagon but when I first got hold of the stuff I used it on my '84 > Tercel and it was just great (and very satisfying to watch) until the > first time I drove under big bright highway street-lights in heavy > rain and the whole windshield lit up like the sun. The wipers > couldn't clear the beads fast enough to help much. After that night > I cleaned it off the windshield and just used it everywhere else. On > the van I use it everywhere; it keeps the glass cleaner [than > without] and makes cleaning it on the road much easier [than > without*]. I don't try to keep it to the point where you hardly need > wipers, probably put it on 2-3 times a year. > > *Can you tell I think hung comparisons are 700% quieter [than the > outside of some big old Ford]? > > Yrs, > d >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »