

| Subject: | Re: Buying a Van - New Question |
| From: | Mike South |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:21:59 -0500 |
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Rotblatt <d.rotblatt@verizon.net>wrote: > The '85 that I looked at has a pretty good tub, interior, etc. The > main problem is that the stick shift bushing is deteriorating so it's > loose at the bottom of the stick shift (under the rubber boot). As a > result, it's nearly impossible to shift - they guy says that Go Westy > has a bushing kit for about $100 - which is fine, I can replace the > bushing. Problem is there is no way to tell if the transmission is > good...when I drove it, I could get it into 1st and 2nd, but not 3rd > or 4th (he could though). There was a slight gear grind as it went > into one of the two each time - I don't thing a loose bushing would > cause this. I would think that as long as the clutch is in it should > slip in and out of gear smoothly regardless of the play in the stick > shift. I want to be able to travel this summer, don't want to be > switching out a tranny - which I figure would cost about $1000. > You might be able to improve your estimate on that by talking to aatransaxle. If prices haven't changed since I bought my rebuilt one from them you're in the right ballpark, but there's a question as to whether the ring and pinion are good in the transmission you have. If so, its fine, if not, there's another factor in the ballpark of 50% to get another good r&p. Again, I don't speak for them, don't know how or if things might have changed, etc, but I can tell you they were awesome to deal with. mike > In addition, the car is missing the air conditioning compressor - just > the two disconnected lines sitting on top of the engine. > > He has reduced the price to $4000. I could probably get him to sell > for $3500. Thoughts? > > Thanks for the input - > > Dan > L.A. > Pre-Vanagon owner > > P.S. - FYI, the '82 with jetta engine was a real project, lots of > surface beach rust - didn't want to touch it. > > > On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Daniel Rotblatt wrote: > > Hi all. I'm new here, just now shopping for a vanagon westfalia. I >> was wondering if I could get some input on some vans available in >> the area that I'm interested in. I'll be looking at them this coming >> week and wanted to get some input as to what to look for. I'll >> modify any info I get with the condition of the car as i see it - >> especially rust (which I know is a real issue). I've done a lot of >> reading and I am mechanically inclined - I've just finished >> rebuilding a 1966 triumph spitfire, and I had a '67 split window van >> (with the mini-pop top) back in the day. $5k is my top dollar or i >> would go for an '86-91 model. >> >> The first van is a 1982 diesel with a gas jetta engine from the >> nineties (1.8 or 1.9 liter I believe). I know to look to see if the >> transaxle (or is it a transmission in these?) is from a later model >> cause the diesel ones are geared differently and the 1980-83 >> transaxle aren't very good. Second I will check the compression on >> the engine and look at the plugs to see how worn it is. The >> advantage of this van is that the engine is more powerful and there >> is no smog check (I'm in california - smog checks are a b**ch). >> They want $5k. >> >> The second is a '85, some body dents in front and a few dings, 1.9 >> water cooled engine. Also $5K. It's a westy top and weekender >> inside, which I like (wider bed, dont need the stove - I set up a >> table with a stove when I camp - fridge might be nice). Advantage >> to this one is that he has a second 1.9 engine which he says is in >> running shape. Also, his other car broke down the other day and >> he's using it as a daily driver - which I think indicates some level >> of reliability. >> >> Anything else specific to look for when I look at them? >> >> Thanks all, I appreciate any input. I'm leaning towards the '82 - >> I like the idea of no smog. >> >> Dan >> Los Angeles, CA >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »