

| Subject: | Re: Auto Trans Modified Governor Test Report [addendum] |
| From: | Robert Fisher |
| Date: | Mon, 23 May 2011 19:31:16 -0700 |
Then again; Ken is in the business of rebuilding burned-out transmissions. : ) j/k Cya, Robert On May 23, 2011 7:10 PM, "Rocket J Squirrel" <camping.elliott@gmail.com> wrote: > I wrote: > > >> re >> I have a question for those of you who drive a 1.9L manual: at what rpm >> do you normally upshift when pulling into traffic, or when climbing up a >> hill? I bet it's higher than 2600 rpm. > > > > On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 15:21 -0700, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote: > > >> >> 'way' above 2,600. >> Probably I'm shifting out of first at 4,200, and out of 2nd at 3,500 or so. >> And out of 3rd at fairly zippy rpm too. >> >> the 1.9 likes to rev nicely. >> I've driven some 84 passenger manual trans vanagons that just rip through >> the gears .. > > <snip> > > My point exactly. I disagree with the idea that the VW engineers had > some overreaching wisdom when they picked these miserably low 2,600 rpm > shift points. It probably made for a genteel ride, nice for the punters > and laydees, but it does not give a fair representation of what the van > could do if only the buyer had chosen a manual. > > Given that Ken at German Transaxle sees no risk to the transmission with > a governor that lets the engine rev to 3,200 before upshifting, and that > he normal driving habits of those who drive manuals of letting the > engines rev much higher than that before shifting, I'm tempted to get > Ken to make me a "super modified" governor.* > > I grew up driving manuals, many of my previous cars were Volkswagens, > Fiats, etc., and I learned a lot about the limitations of small boxer > engines driving heavy buses (my previous was a 1971 bay window with a > 1600 dp engine and the revered Bob Hoover tutored me, lived about 5 > miles from my house in Vista, Calif.) so I know how to get a heavy bus > or van up to speed without stressing the engine, and it does not involve > upshifting at 2,600 rpm. In fact, that would have been stupid given how > much weaker the bottom end is on those earlier engine designs. > > (In case anyone wonders, I do yearn for a manual. This Westy fell into > our laps with fewer than 70,000 miles on the clock back in 2006 or so. > So who was I to say no? To whine that it's not a manual?) > > ============ > Wile E. Coyote: Super genius. I like the sound of that.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »