

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon a/c |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Tue, 24 May 2011 21:26:23 -0500 |
Jeff, for your information, I drive the Vanagon only for camping. further, you can take your insults off the list. I (and others, so I have been told) are sick of them. ---- Jeff Schwaia <vw.doka@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course you do... that's why you drive a Vanagon. > > On the other hand, perhaps you prefer global warming (climate change in PC terms) over a hole in the ozone layer... Name your poison: R134a = greenhouse gas; R12 = CFC. > > If you really care about the environment, we'd all appreciate it if you would turn off your computer and save the electricity... > > Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mcneely4@cox.net [mailto:mcneely4@cox.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 6:30 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM; Jeff Schwaia > Subject: Re: [VANAGON] Vanagon a/c > > ---- Jeff Schwaia <vw.doka@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > R134a is a poor replacement for R12. It's not nearly as efficient and it runs at a much high pressure that the old Vanagon system has problems with. > > > > The R12 scare is dead. It's not hard to find and isn't too expensive. I get it for about $30 a can as compared to R134a at $15 a can. > > > > The Vanagon system was designed for R12 and works very well. Personally, I would never switch an A/C system designed for R12 to R134a. What's the point... to save $50 on Freon? > > Jeff, some of us care about environmental consequences of our actions. mcneely > -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »