

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon a/c |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Wed, 25 May 2011 09:24:34 -0500 |
Rob, I know denial is a fun game. Enjoy. mcneely ---- Rob <becida@COMCAST.NET> wrote: > This was a good thread up to now, had one of the best ever set of > directions for getting your AC on the road again. > > Now? Oh wow.. > Here is a chart showing the last 10k years of earth temps as taken > from Greenland ice core readings, not much direct Vanagon stuff there > but it is interesting to note that it's often been a lot warmer than > it is now... Not to worry it's usually only 10k years between ice > ages. Now I know earth cycles don't count for much but if they did > I'd get that ac system up and running, it might get warmer before the > winter snows don't melt before the next one arrives and a working AC > will be of value to you down in central America. > http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/assets_c/2010/12/easterbrook_fig5.php > > I thought R-12 was illegal to make in this country & the rest of the > west, only China and India were allowed all the R-12 they wanted? Has > this changed? > > FWIW water vapor is a green house gas but it beats me why anyone > would rather have an ice age than a warmer world, I keep wondering > what their agenda is. > > I have shackles with my tow strap so I can hook it to something, my > trailer hitch is attached to the loops in back but there is a place I > can put a shackle on the hitch. > > Rob > becida@comcast.net > > > > > At 5/24/2011 07:12 PM, Jeff Schwaia wrote: > >Of course you do... that's why you drive a Vanagon. > > > >On the other hand, perhaps you prefer global warming (climate change > >in PC terms) over a hole in the ozone layer... Name your poison: > >R134a = greenhouse gas; R12 = CFC. > > > >If you really care about the environment, we'd all appreciate it if > >you would turn off your computer and save the electricity... > > > >Jeff > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: mcneely4@cox.net [mailto:mcneely4@cox.net] > >Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 6:30 PM > >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM; Jeff Schwaia > >Subject: Re: [VANAGON] Vanagon a/c > > > >---- Jeff Schwaia <vw.doka@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > > R134a is a poor replacement for R12. It's not nearly as > > efficient and it runs at a much high pressure that the old Vanagon > > system has problems with. > > > > > > The R12 scare is dead. It's not hard to find and isn't too > > expensive. I get it for about $30 a can as compared to R134a at $15 a can. > > > > > > The Vanagon system was designed for R12 and works very > > well. Personally, I would never switch an A/C system designed for > > R12 to R134a. What's the point... to save $50 on Freon? > > > >Jeff, some of us care about environmental consequences of our > >actions. mcneely -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »