

| Subject: | Re: Thermostats [Was: Spooked!] |
| From: | Scott Daniel - Turbovans |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:25:05 -0700 |
you're on the right track Jack. for this time of year, the cooler t-stat is just perfect. you stand to go through all kinds of mess and trouble for no real gain right now if you change our your cooler t-stat. Wait till fall.. then install the hotter one. Have a cool one instead, or whatever your pleasure is. and ..seriously............there really are times when it is WAY smarter to leave 'well enough alone'. Man , if I had a dollar for every time something on a car or vanagon was about 95 % perfect, and I thought..well, just this one little tweak or operation and it'll be 100% .. and then I lost ground ...or it didn't make it any better.. and I WISHED I had left it alone ...I'd be much richer , or much less poor, than I am !! I think you are just fine as is. Really. Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rocket J Squirrel" <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 6:53 AM Subject: Re: Thermostats [Was: Spooked!] > Thanks for the deeper explanation of how the system works. > > I understood that the thermostat isn't a binary on-off thingy, but a > device that gradually opens once we hit the bottom end of its range. > Scott said he didn't like the low-temp ones in winter, and what I was > questioning was whether that made any especial difference, since > regardless of whether it's cold or hot outside, the engine will get > hotter and hotter until it reaches the bottom end of the t-stat's range > and the t-stat will then work to keep the engine within its control > range. > > IOW, season does not make a difference? > > PS. Thing I've learned is to not disregard Scott's words, but I do like > to look at them more deeply. > > PPS. I think the arguments here in favor of the stock t-stat are good > ones, and if changing the t-stat was super easy I'd do it in a > heartbeat. But I somehow sense that we're talking a lot of coolant loss > in the process, and a messy driveway, and buckets of coolant to somehow > dispose of. Not to mention the whole gosh-darn cooling system filling > and bleeding rigamarole. > > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 01:36 -0400, David Beierl wrote: > >> At 12:47 AM 6/4/2011, Rocket J Squirrel wrote: >> >Winter or summer, the thermostat will pretty much bring the engine up to >> >80C (or 87C, depending its setpoint), yes? >> > >> >Seems to me that regardless of whether there is snow on the ground or >> >molten asphalt, the engine will just get hotter and hotter until the >> >thermostat cracks open, and it's the thermostat's job to modulate the >> >amount of water going to the rad to keep the coolant -- at the point >> >where the thermostat senses it -- at the setpoint temperature. >> >> It isn't a setpoint so much as a balance - the 'stat opens over a >> range of about 35F, so while you're in the control range of the >> system the temperature at the thermostat will be between ~185F and >> 220F. The fan will be running at high speed ~ten degrees before the >> thermostat is fully open. >> >> Once you hit 220F you're now dependent on the ability of the >> radiator/fan to reject heat so you've got a new balance between 220F >> and the system boiling point, which should be close to 260F if you're >> running 50/50 ethylene-glycol coolant and your pressure cap is in >> good shape (265F at 15 psi, I think our caps are 13 psi). It's still >> a balance because heat transfer goes up with the square of >> temperature difference.* >> >> Somewhere at the top of that range you'll notice a little red light >> blinking on your temp gauge, and VW specifically says (owners manual, >> page 37 in the '89 book) that elevated gauge temps are "not serious" >> until the light starts blinking. According to "some antifreeze mfr" >> 260F is a common setpoint for engine overheat alarms. >> >> *this margin between 220F and boiling point decreases at altitude, >> since it's absolute pressure and not gauge pressure that really >> matters... >> >> "Open-deck" engines like the Subaru (according to the Subaruvanagon >> list folks) are not so tolerant of temperature excursions, so the >> Subaru cooling system is regulated a good deal more tightly than the >> WBX in normal operation. It still has the same margins at the >> extremes, but the thermostat system works more crisply. >> >> Yrs, >> d >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »