

| Subject: | Re: AAZ diesel conversion |
| From: | Karl Mullendore |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:00:47 -0400 |
Scott, I'm not sure how you arrived at the conclusion that 'environmental and emissions' are exclusive only to 'e-tdis'. There is no proof or evidence to that point, at least when we are probably talking about the early TDI that coincidentally uses a primarily mechanical system to deliver fuel. Only with TDIs starting in 2004 (US market) did this change to 'true' electronic control. FWIW, my own modified m-TDI Syncro makes more power than my chipped Passat e-TDI, while it's emissions are far cleaner. The Syncro still gets 28 mpg all the time, 30 on slower days. Perhaps your feeling is clouded by other's attempts at setting up m-TDIs. I am a little confused also by the statement "there is a direct connection from the combustion chamber to the air we breathe with the older style diesels" - virtually every internal combustion engine has a direct connection. Karl www.westyventures.com www.propexusa.com Scott wrote: Currently I am more in favor of e-tdi's for environmental and emissions reasons, and do not like at all that there is a direct connection from the combustion chamber to the air we breathe with the older style diesels.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »