

| Subject: | Re: Engine Conversion Idea... |
| From: | ralph meyermann |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:00:14 -0600 |
The emissions side I see how the smog police would frown, the small light weight rotary may be a descent option,are you thinking the turbo version for more power? Velma 82diesel 1.6 na westy On Oct 16, 2011 11:49 AM, "Dave Mcneely" <mcneely4@cox.net> wrote: ---- Evan Mac Donald <evanm@ATT.NET> wrote: > All right. I have been thinking of off-beat, kind of ... Well, for one you are very unlikely to be able to meet emission standards. The original could not do so even in its factory configuration in a Mazda, iirc. I realize that lots of people seem to want to (and are happy when they have done so) put engines other than the waterboxer in their vans. The waterboxer does what it was jury rigged to do by VW, run the van fairly efficiently and smoothly. There are kinks compared to more modern vehicles, but compared to the cars we had back in the day, it is a miracle on wheels (thought I'd never think that or say so, but it is true). If you want more power, GoWesty builds excellent waterboxers that are upgraded to larger displacement, power, and torque. And you won't be driving a transformed vehicle that few people will know how or be willing to work on should you eventually send the vehicle on to someone else. Just my belief. Someone who can exercise skill, knowledge, and ingenuity in re-engineering a vehicle does have my admiration. mcneely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »