

| Subject: | Re: Aerodynamics related to fuel consumption (for an 84 tin top) |
| From: | Alistair Bell |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:52:48 -0700 |
I got better gas milage, even loaded down for 3 week trip, when I have the 18 ft canoe on top. alistair On 2011-10-24, at 5:29 PM, Don Hanson wrote: > For appx. 3 weeks I ran with my Quick-N-Easy roof rack on my vanagon, > having to carry some long stuff. It's a full width two-bar rack, with the > cross bars made from Alaskan yellow cedar, appx. 2x4" and just a little > narrower, side to side, than my stock mirrors. The 'bars' have large radius > corners. I was working about 60mi round trip from home, but otherwise > driving in the same area and at the same speeds I do in 'real life' (when I > am doing what I want, not working for pay) > > My vanagon is a 5sp with a 2.0 liter Jetta inline gas motor and I've > always kept track of my fuel mileage, every tank for about 4 years now. > I've averaged ~23mpg really consistently. If I use premium fuel without > corn, I get almost 2 mpg more. If I drive at 75 all day, I get a few mpg > less. On my 4 or 5 fill-ups while sporting that roof rack, my gas mileage > declined by almost 2 miles per gallon. > > Then, two tanks ago I took the rack off...it is Quick and Easy, so why > not, plus I'm out of work again so no need...The gas consumption again is > 22.++ or 23 and 'small change'.... So there it is, a statistical sample of > one, but it is accurate. I fill at the same pump, letting the same auto > shut off stop the flow (and spew some backwash out on the station's > driveway) each time. I fill at about 275 miles run. I had the same weight > load aboard. I only carried a long ladder one time (30 miles) on the roof. > > In case anyone is interested in how aerodynamic drag sucks down the gas...
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »