gee Dave, where I be without you :)

thanks for clearing that up, I thought that a squadron of Lancasters had come in to do the job.

alistair

On 2011-11-04, at 10:57 AM, Dave Mcneely wrote:

> The report does not say "burst."  It speaks of "breaching."  In other places in the report, it mentions the dam being "removed."  I believe this is a purposeful removal of an obsolete dam.  The rafter who was interviewed had been hired (by whom not stated) to assess silt in the river in relation to the breaching.
> 
> mcneely
> 
> ---- Alistair Bell <albell@SHAW.CA> wrote:
>> on the Columbia river  system
>> 
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LxMHmw3Z-U&feature=player_embedded
>> 
>> Seattle TImes article
>> 
>> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016678515_apwadamremoval1stldwritethru.html
>> 
>> 
>> alistair
> 
> --
> David McNeely