Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: Exhaust Design Contemplations...
From:ralph meyermann
Date:Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:21:33 -0600

Without the weak links maybe a ceramic type coating inside and out??

Velma 82diesel 1.6 na westy

On Nov 14, 2011 7:09 PM, "Evan Mac Donald" <evanm@att.net> wrote:

Ok everybody - its time we tried to replace the tire thread with a new one -

I own an '85 with a 1.9 WBX. I put stock exhaust systems on 3 times in 10
years,
then put on an S & S header. It also lasted about three years, but with less
driving. ( Michigan winters, see.) The first, and main point of failure on
the
1.9 system was the wretched two-into-one join at the collector. Each of the
three systems that I have had fail went there first. By a noticeable
stretch.
These were not cheepie repro, but real Dansk items.

When I look at the design of the 2.1 system, I see that this weak spot has
been
replaced with a very different design, using a casting in that particular
weak
spot. (As an aside, I also noticed the design of the 2.1 1 - 3 and 2 - 4
headers
flanges at the collector end was also changed, to keep you from any partial
updates to your exhaust. Grrrrr....)

And I am also ignoring cat converters and mufflers. I put my own mufflers
on,
thank you very much, and they aren't VW standard.

My simplistic question, attempting to ignore as many extraneous variables as
possible is:

Which exhaust design is better? 1.9 Or 2.1? Pros and cons are what I mean.
The
stainless issue is also not to be considered here, before you even mention
it.

Better breathing?

Longer lasting?

Stronger?
 Evan Mac Donald

"...in the absence of facts, myth rushes in, the kudzu of history."
-Stacy Schiff