

| Subject: | Re: Carrier Bars? |
| From: | Michael Snow |
| Date: | Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:02:51 -0500 |
On 12/04/2011 01:59 PM, Jim Arnott wrote: > Inline replacing a waterboxer. I keep getting ambiguous answers. > > Question: '84 wasserboxer. > > I have diesel bellhousing. Plan is a 2.0 cross flow gas motor at 50 > deg. Keeping stock wasserboxer gearbox. Do I need the '82 carrier > bars or the '83 carrier bars? (I have them both....) Which makes this > project a bolt-in? > > Again: > '84 waterboxer > 50 deg install > Keeping original 091 four speed gearbox in original location > Using '82 diesel bell housing > > '82 carrier bars or '83/4 carrier bars? > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim I helped a friend do this with a 1.8 gas motor in October. Using the '83 carrier bars, the WBX transmission with diesel bellhousing is a bolt-in. I also have this setup in my '82 diesel. With the inline crankshaft, you need to shorten the transmission input shaft or source the correct replacement. Mine is shortened by abount 12mm. Don't forget the pilot bearing, which is not used in the transverse installation. Mike
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »