

| Subject: | Re: 87 syncro non camper, needs clutch. Utah |
| From: | Jeff Schwaia |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:27:38 -0800 |
Tom, The Syncro is in Elsinore, UT. That's somewhere between SLC and Las Vegas. Seems like BFE to me... If it were in SLC, I'd probably buy it! Cheers, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Tom Buese [mailto:tombuese@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:53 PM To: Jeff Schwaia Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: 87 syncro non camper, needs clutch. Utah Hey Jeff, LOL! You must not get out much if youse think we are in BFE! Way nicer than Sacramento????? & our NBA team isn't as bad as yours? If you take I-80, it is 150 miles shorter than Hiway 50 & they actually plow the roads in Nevada & even in BFE Utah! There are also gambling places & brothels along the way in Nevada that cater to old guys like youse! I have already forwarded the link to a friendly vanagon & syncro hunter here , Thanks for the link Ken, but he's got a syncro just like that one, that he paid $400-500 for, IIRC. Uses it on deep lite powder days to get up the Canyon. YMMV, Mr. BZ-moving to BFE Maine soon On Dec 22, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Jeff Schwaia wrote: > Looks like a good deal. If it wasn't in BFE I would consider driving over > and towing it back to Sacramento. Unfortunately, I just don't feel like > towing a Vanagon on the loneliest highway in the US in the middle of winter. > Must be getting old... > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Ken Wyatt > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:18 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: FS: 87 syncro non camper, needs clutch. Utah > > Here's a 1987 syncro vanagon (non westy) for $1200 or less. Its been in > one of the local free want ads. Van needs clutch according to ad. Not mine > at all. Picture looks pretty good. Thought maybe one of our syncro > hunters might be interested. > > http://www.ksl.com/?nid=218&ad=18451432&cat=&lpid=&search=vanagon > > cheers > ken
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »