Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: Pictures from bURNINGvAN 2012
From:BenT Syncro
Date:Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:27:51 -0800

NF is afterall just a letter away from SF. They're both CA, right? But half the Vanagons in similar condition as mine probably won't survive the trek.

BenT

sent from my electronic leash

On Jan 24, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Mike Miller <mwmiller6@ATT.NET> wrote:

> We're thinking of moving it to NF next year though. We're tired of the
> good weather and easy drive.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Joy Hecht wrote:
> 
>> If I'm on that side of the continent, sure, I'll take people
>> pictures!  I
>> live around 5000 miles away, tho, it's a bit far.
>> 
>> I knew it was in California, and the same place every year, was just
>> wondering where.
>> 
>> 
>> Joy
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM, BenT Syncro <syncro@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> People pictures are Mike's department.  Vehicle rollcall pics are
>>> BenT's.
>>> Stephan's pics are balanced between people and vehicles as is
>>> Cris's kite
>>> pics. Glen & Jen are new to the scene and excited about seeing other
>>> Vanagons.
>>> 
>>> So there is your explanation. We've holding this event in the same
>>> spot
>>> for 9 years. It's always at Ocean Beach in San Francisco,
>>> California, USA.
>>> Details posted in The Samba and various forums. Now that you know
>>> where it
>>> is, should we expect you next year to take people pics?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> BenT
>>> sent from my electronic leash
>>> 
>>> On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Joy Hecht <jhecht@ALUM.MIT.EDU> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Aerial shots are rather cool!  Where is this event held, anyway?
>>>> 
>>>> But this has to be a guy thing - 90-odd photos, and not more than
>>>> five
>>>> people?  I really do think if women were taking these photos they
>>>> would
>>> be
>>>> pictures of the people, not the vehicles!  Now I remember why we
>>>> created
>>>> that VW face page on Larry Chase's website - but we probably
>>>> looked much
>>>> younger then!  ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Joy
>>>