

| Subject: | Re: 81 Air cooled... Engine conversion options?? |
| From: | Robert Keezer |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:52:35 -0700 |
I think that a 115 hp 2 liter inline 4 engine is a vast improvement over a 67 hp air-cooled engine.Worth the extra work : more power , heaters that actually work, improved engine life, better reliability.�Of course there are many more tasks involved such as cutting a lower radiator hole in front, running pipes and hoses front to rear, removing the dash for a water-cooled airbox and heater core, splicing in a engine harness, and mods to the transmission.�The air-cooled trans is ideal for the Diesel or gas conversion. True, a rebuild is easier, and that may be the reason to keep it that if it works for you.�Since I converted in 1995, and upgraded to a 2 liter ABA in 1999, I'm running on the same engine nearly 12 years. Nothing but trouble were air-cooleds for me, except the venerable Bug. If your air-cooled has been running that long or longer , less power to ya! Robert1982 Westfalia 95 Golf engine --- On Sun, 3/11/12, Jim Morgan <JM060356@AOL.COM> wrote: From: Jim Morgan <JM060356@AOL.COM> Subject: Re: 81 Air cooled... Engine conversion options?? To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Date: Sunday, March 11, 2012, 10:14 AM My 2 cents worth. Just rebuild the air cooled engine. The cost and time of a conversion are way more than what the van is worth. especially TIME! In a week you could have it back on the road probably running better than it has in a long time and spend under a grand if you diy or havegood friends. just my .02 worth. Jim Morgan 80 vanagon "stink bomb" 74 super beetle
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »