

| Subject: | Re: WAS Low Temp Radiator Thermo Switch "Better"? |
| From: | Scott Daniel - Turbovans |
| Date: | Sat, 26 May 2012 14:31:34 -0700 |
I agree.. on the 1.9. 2.1 is easy right on top .. diesel vanagon isn't 'that bad' ...just messy as it's underneath .. a bit easier to access than on the 19 wbxr. Didn't say it was easy or practical .. just preferred. Scott www.turbovans.com On 5/26/2012 9:02 AM, Vanagon wrote: > It's too much of a pain to swap the thermo twice a year on a 1.9 for me to do that. > > Sent from my iPhone. > > On May 25, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans<scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote: > >> here's what I like.. >> the 87 C 'stat for winter, when you want better heater performance and the engine running nicely warm ( for better fuel economy ) >> >> and the 80 C in summer, with Water Wetter for when things want to run hotter. >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »