

| Subject: | Re: Automatic vs Manual |
| From: | Robert Stevens |
| Date: | Sat, 26 May 2012 21:03:48 -0600 |
On May 26, 2012, at 8:29 PM, craig cowan wrote: "When I finally got this automatic transmissioned '90GL on the road as my winter car.... i was blown away! At first, I had bigtime issues. I was reaching for the clutch pedal constantly. Finally I got used to it. Then for two months it was my daily and my syncro slept. I began to like it! Going in town, it's epic. Its significantly faster on acceleration between 0-20 than a manual transmissioned van. Theres a terrible power spot at about 35 hitting a hill.... it tries to stay in a gear and really should downshift, but you always can just downshift it yourself. It grew on me bigtime. Suddenly I have all the joys of a vanagon, the same "feel", but I don't shift! It's a better highway cruiser in my mind than my other vans as well. The day I jumped into my giant lifted syncro from my tiny lowered GL (automatic) was night and day. Suddenly I have to do all this work to drive the car! SHIFTING....pfff.... yuck. I've since regained my joy in the syncro, but I must say, these automatic vans rock! I will forever own a giant syncro, and a lowered automatic bus. Auto+cruise control rocks. The vanagon cruise control can be used at any speed, so if you're going through a state park for instance and the speed limit is a slow 25mph, set it! The auto will downshift as needed for hills." Craigs experience with his auto-trannied vanagon pretty much depicts mine. I loved the '91 Westy I had. Learned to use the VERY nicely matched 2.1 with the auto in all situations, circumstances and conditions. It was a GL so had all the "bells-n-whistles". Being in Utah, it was my daily, so dealt with snowy conditions. It was a more relaxed-feeling of driving than my current Syncro, which I dig to the max. bob
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »