I just don't understand how the lower temp thermostat is really beneficial.

Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Daniel - Turbovans
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:32 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Re: WAS Low Temp Radiator Thermo Switch "Better"?

I agree..
on the 1.9.
2.1 is easy right on top ..
diesel vanagon isn't 'that bad' ...just messy as it's underneath ..
a bit easier to access than on the 19 wbxr.

Didn't say it was easy or practical ..
just preferred.
Scott
www.turbovans.com

On 5/26/2012 9:02 AM, Vanagon wrote:
> It's too much of a pain to swap the thermo twice a year on a 1.9 for me to
do that.
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Scott Daniel -
Turbovans<scottdaniel@turbovans.com>  wrote:
>
>> here's what I like..
>> the 87 C 'stat for winter, when you want better heater performance and
the engine running nicely warm  ( for better         fuel economy )
>>
>> and the 80 C in summer, with Water Wetter for when things want to run
hotter.
>>