

| Subject: | Re: when is stopping/restarting better than idling? |
| From: | Dennis Haynes |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:08:44 -0400 |
There are two concerns with this practice. How many cycles can the starter take and depending on conditions the effect stopping the cooling system can have on the engine. Especially after an extended highway run a 1-2 minute idle down will prevent heat soak from creating a temperature spike and stress head gaskets and stuff. Vehicles designed for this type operation use electric water pumps to maintain some coolant flow. Audi turbos also used water pumps and fan controls for after cooling. Some even had injector/manifold cooling fans. To deal with this. The concept sounds good as anytime the engine is running when the vehicle is not moving you are getting 0 miles to a gallon. I really don't know the magic number. In New York trucks are not allowed to idle beyond three minutes except for warm up and when the outside temp is below 25F. When I bought my motorhome in 2004 it was pre-programmed to shut off after idling for three minutes. Was that a coincidence? Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of pickle vanagon Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 7:25 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: when is stopping/restarting better than idling? I guess I'm looking just for the range of educated opinions of the listmembers. In a well-maintained Vanagon, how long does a stop have to be for it to be better to stop the engine and later restart it, versus idling? 10 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes, etc? I'm wondering about the theory of it, not the practical aspects as relate to the needs of actually driving around other vehicles... -Wes
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »