

| Subject: | Re: 16" wheel in front spare location? |
| From: | pickle vanagon |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:26:35 -0400 |
Just to correct myself: Both the WRC and WRG2 tires are asymmetrical, but *not* directional. That is, they are inside/outside specific, but don't specify a direction of rotation. So you can cross-rotate, for example. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:33 AM, pickle vanagon <greenvanagon@gmail.com>wrote: > So having looked through options more I see another option is Nokian WR C > Van tires in 215/65/16. Are these too tall for the brakes on an '84? > Otherwise I think they'd be great. The load index is 107. > > (The whole catalyst for my move to larger wheels is just to be able to run > all-weather Nokian tires. The 215/60/16's I'm looking at are XL rated, > they're Nokian WRG2 tires.) > > The 225 option sounds good but I can't use tires that wide on the 16 inch > wheels I'm getting without using spacers, which I want to avoid for now. > (I don't relish the idea of removing those rear wheel nuts just to remove > the hubs and change out to longer studs.) > > I know having a smaller spare is a fine option but I consider that a > downgrade in capability for us. When we have gotten a flat I've really > appreciated the full spare. (With Nokian's there's a 50/50 chance your > spare is mounted in the wrong direction but I consider this a non-issue.) > I think either of these 215's will at least go in the oversized van-cafe > spare carrier. > > > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com>wrote: > >> For that size tire you want to make sure you get the "XL" or "reinforced" >> version. In that size the standard load index is 94, 1477 pounds without >> the >> derate. By going up one more size, 225/60-16 the standard load index goes >> to >> 98, 1653 pounds. There are also many more choices in that size. Depending >> on >> wheel offset sliding door clearance may be real tight. >> >> For the spare tire carrier later vans that came from the factory with the >> 205/70-14's also had a different tire tray, hold down bars, and even >> radiator hoses to make some more room. The later tray would be easier to >> get >> a 215 section tire in it. The 225's won't make without extreme effort. Be >> careful that the tire does not rub on the steering shaft. Since it is not >> a >> syncro I would go with a thinner spare. The 225/60 are available if needed >> while traveling. >> >> Dennis >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf >> Of >> Robert Stevens >> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:33 PM >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> Subject: Re: 16" wheel in front spare location? >> >> On Jun 27, 2012, at 9:33 AM, pickle vanagon wrote: >> >> What modifications would be involved to get a 16x7 wheel with a 215/60/16 >> tire to fit in the stock tire location? >> >> This is in a (non-syncro) 84. >> >> Your tire diameter is only just over 1/2" greater than stock, at 26.1". >> The section width is wider but not enough to make fitting that into the >> spare area a problem. It's when you get above 27" diameter that things get >> crowded. If you do get rubbing, take the spring steel device out, which >> holds the spare clamshell onto the frame crossmember, and use bolts to >> hold >> it on. >> >> bob >> > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »